Benchmarking: Bond - Santa Rita

Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita

Latchireddi, S. & Faria, E., Achievement of High Energy Efficiency in Grinding Mills at Santa Rita, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.

Faria, E. & Latchireddi, S., Commissioning and Operation of Milling Circuit at Santa Rita Nickel Operation, Paper #137: Proceedings of the International Autogenous Grinding, Semiautogenous Grinding and High Pressure Grinding Roll Technology Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 2011.

Design Criteria

A survey was conducted on July 15, 2010 and reported the following:

• Ore A×b 50.2
• Ore ball mill work index 18.4 kWh/tonne
• Circuit FAG mill feed F₈₀ 141 mm
• Circuit cyclone overflow P₈₀ 146 µm

To run the Bond/Barratt model requires work index values for rod milling and crushing. The reported A×b (50.2) is similar to these values:

• Wi_RM 15.0 kWh/tonne
• Wi_C 15.0 kWh/tonne

Model parameter fitting

The following tables back-calculate the "Essbm contingency" model fitting parameter for the Bond/Barratt SABC model (which includes allowance for phantom cyclone effects). Specific energy references the "mill shell" kW values (note that specific energy values in the references relate to power at the DCS).

	FAG	BM	Peb Crusher	Etotal
DCS kW	6,667	5,082
Shell kW	6,208	4,732	224
Throughput, t/h	650	650	650
Specific Energy, kWh/t	9.55	7.28	0.34	17.18
Essbm				16.82
contingency				2.1%

The default model contingency is 10%, so this circuit is operating more efficiently. Note that the lack of actual work index measurements in the rod mill and crushing size classes means there is uncertainty in the E_ssbm measurement used to estimate the contingency.

Circuit Simulation

Screenshot of the Santa Rita circuit simulation

Combining the Bond/Barratt specific energy model, the Austin FAG model described in the bibliography and the Morrell ball mill model described in the bibliography results in the following throughput predictions using the work index values above:

• Actual FAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 6,208 kW / 4,732 kW
• Actual daily average throughput: 650 tonnes/hour
• Predicted FAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 5,785 kW / 4,420 kW
• Predicted nominal throughput: 564 tonnes/hour (14.2% difference)

	FAG	BM	Pebble Crusher	total
Measured specific energy consumption, kWh/t	9.55	7.28	0.34	17.18
Predicted specific energy consumption, kWh/t	10.26	7.84	0.40	18.50
Difference, kWh/t	0.71	0.56	0.06	1.32
Difference, %	7.2%	7.4%	14.9%	7.4%

The model specific energy consumption estimates are 7.4% higher than the actual values, and the mill model power draw estimates are about 7% lower than actual. The net effect is the throughput estimates are 14% lower for the model versus the survey.