Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw Models

From SAGMILLING.COM
Revision as of 21:34, 27 January 2013 by Alex Doll (talk | contribs) (Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Meadowbank)
Jump to: navigation, search

Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Fimiston

  • Nelson, M; Valery, W; Morrell, S, Performance Characteristics and Optimisation of the Fimiston (KCGM) SAG Mill Circuit, Page 233 - 248, SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Survey Survey Power,
kW at input
Mill speed,
%critical
Total load,
%v/v
Pulp %solids,
w/w
Morrell SAG Model,
kW at input / shell
Nordberg Model,
kW at input / shell
Survey 1 3,864 68.3 38.7 72.0 3,933 / 3,776 3,592 / 3,345
  • Morrell model predicts 2% high
  • Nordberg model predicts 7% low

See details of benchmarking

Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Meadowbank

  • Muteb, P. & Allaire, J., Meadowbank Mine Process Plant Throughput Increase, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
DCS Power, kW Mill filling Morrell Model, kW Nordberg model, kW
May 2012 4,341 30.6% v/v 4,765 (+9.3%) 4,423 (+1.9%)

See details of benchmarking

Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Santa Rita

  • Latchireddi, S. & Faria, E., Achievement of High Energy Efficiency in Grinding Mills at Santa Rita, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
DCS Power, kW Mill filling Morrell Model, kW Nordberg model, kW
July 2010 5085 27.5% v/v 5093 (+0.2%) 4626 (-9.5%)

See details of benchmarking