Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking: Specific Energy Consumption Models"
(→Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank) |
m |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[category:Models]] |
[[category:Models]] |
||
[[category:Benchmarking]] |
[[category:Benchmarking]] |
||
+ | ==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain== |
||
+ | |||
+ | * ''Morrison, R.'', '''Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain'''. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Result for default model conditions: |
||
+ | {| class="wikitable" border="1" |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | ! |
||
+ | ! Tonnage |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | Model |
||
+ | | 1455 t/h |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | Measured |
||
+ | | 1600 t/h |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | Difference |
||
+ | | 145 t/h |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | Difference |
||
+ | | 9.5% |
||
+ | |} |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Benchmarking: Bond - Copper Mountain|Show details of benchmarking]] |
||
+ | |||
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox== |
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox== |
||
* ''Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K.'', '''The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation'''. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada. |
* ''Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K.'', '''The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation'''. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada. |
||
Line 46: | Line 72: | ||
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Fort Knox|Show details of benchmarking]] |
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Fort Knox|Show details of benchmarking]] |
||
− | ==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain== |
||
− | |||
− | * ''Morrison, R.'', '''Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain'''. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada. |
||
− | |||
− | Result for default model conditions: |
||
− | {| class="wikitable" border="1" |
||
− | |- |
||
− | ! |
||
− | ! Tonnage |
||
− | |- |
||
− | | Model |
||
− | | 1455 t/h |
||
− | |- |
||
− | | Measured |
||
− | | 1600 t/h |
||
− | |- |
||
− | | Difference |
||
− | | 145 t/h |
||
− | |- |
||
− | | Difference |
||
− | | 9.5% |
||
− | |} |
||
− | |||
− | |||
− | [[Benchmarking: Bond - Copper Mountain|Show details of benchmarking]] |
||
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank== |
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank== |
||
Line 96: | Line 97: | ||
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Meadowbank|Show details of benchmarking]] |
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Meadowbank|Show details of benchmarking]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita== |
||
+ | |||
+ | [[Benchmarking: Bond - Santa Rita|Show details of benchmarking]] |
Revision as of 22:07, 27 January 2013
Contents
- 1 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain
- 2 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox
- 3 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank
- 4 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain
- Morrison, R., Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada.
Result for default model conditions:
Tonnage | |
---|---|
Model | 1455 t/h |
Measured | 1600 t/h |
Difference | 145 t/h |
Difference | 9.5% |
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox
- Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K., The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Result for default model conditions:
Etotal | WiO | Tonnage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 11.95 | 16.60 | kWh/t | 1,522 | t/h |
Measured | 10.50 | 13.97 | kWh/t | 1,733 | t/h |
Difference | 1.45 | 2.63 | kWh/t | 211 | t/h |
Difference | 12.9% | 17.2% | 12.9% |
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank
- Muteb, P. & Allaire, J., Meadowbank Mine Process Plant Throughput Increase, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
Paper describes a "sick" SAG mill and the changes made to "bring it to health". The "healthy" mill conditions benchmark as follows:
- Actual SAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 3,168 kW / 4,105 kW
- Actual daily average throughput: 500 tonnes/hour
- Predicted SAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 3,096 kW / 4,182 kW
- Predicted nominal throughput: 500 tonnes/hour (0% difference)
SAG | Ball Mill | total | |
---|---|---|---|
Measured specific energy consumption, kWh/t | 6.34 | 8.21 | 14.55 |
Predicted specific energy consumption, kWh/t | 6.19 | 8.36 | 14.55 |
Difference, kWh/t | -0.15 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
Difference, % | -2.3% | 1.8% | 0.0% |