Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking: Specific Energy Consumption Models"

From SAGMILLING.COM
Jump to: navigation, search
(Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank)
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[category:Models]]
 
[[category:Models]]
 
[[category:Benchmarking]]
 
[[category:Benchmarking]]
  +
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain==
  +
  +
* ''Morrison, R.'', '''Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain'''. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada.
  +
  +
Result for default model conditions:
  +
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
  +
|-
  +
!
  +
! Tonnage
  +
|-
  +
| Model
  +
| 1455 t/h
  +
|-
  +
| Measured
  +
| 1600 t/h
  +
|-
  +
| Difference
  +
| 145 t/h
  +
|-
  +
| Difference
  +
| 9.5%
  +
|}
  +
  +
  +
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Copper Mountain|Show details of benchmarking]]
  +
 
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox==
 
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox==
 
* ''Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K.'', '''The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation'''. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
 
* ''Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K.'', '''The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation'''. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Line 46: Line 72:
 
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Fort Knox|Show details of benchmarking]]
 
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Fort Knox|Show details of benchmarking]]
   
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain==
 
 
* ''Morrison, R.'', '''Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain'''. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada.
 
 
Result for default model conditions:
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
 
|-
 
!
 
! Tonnage
 
|-
 
| Model
 
| 1455 t/h
 
|-
 
| Measured
 
| 1600 t/h
 
|-
 
| Difference
 
| 145 t/h
 
|-
 
| Difference
 
| 9.5%
 
|}
 
 
 
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Copper Mountain|Show details of benchmarking]]
 
   
 
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank==
 
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank==
Line 96: Line 97:
   
 
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Meadowbank|Show details of benchmarking]]
 
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Meadowbank|Show details of benchmarking]]
  +
  +
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita==
  +
  +
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Santa Rita|Show details of benchmarking]]

Revision as of 22:07, 27 January 2013

Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain

  • Morrison, R., Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada.

Result for default model conditions:

Tonnage
Model 1455 t/h
Measured 1600 t/h
Difference 145 t/h
Difference 9.5%


Show details of benchmarking

Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox

  • Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K., The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

Result for default model conditions:

Etotal WiO Tonnage
Model 11.95 16.60 kWh/t 1,522 t/h
Measured 10.50 13.97 kWh/t 1,733 t/h
Difference 1.45 2.63 kWh/t 211 t/h
Difference 12.9% 17.2% 12.9%

Show details of benchmarking


Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank

  • Muteb, P. & Allaire, J., Meadowbank Mine Process Plant Throughput Increase, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.

Paper describes a "sick" SAG mill and the changes made to "bring it to health". The "healthy" mill conditions benchmark as follows:

  • Actual SAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 3,168 kW / 4,105 kW
  • Actual daily average throughput: 500 tonnes/hour
  • Predicted SAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 3,096 kW / 4,182 kW
  • Predicted nominal throughput: 500 tonnes/hour (0% difference)
SAG Ball Mill total
Measured specific energy consumption, kWh/t 6.34 8.21 14.55
Predicted specific energy consumption, kWh/t 6.19 8.36 14.55
Difference, kWh/t -0.15 0.15 0.00
Difference, % -2.3% 1.8% 0.0%

Show details of benchmarking

Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita

Show details of benchmarking