Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking: Specific Energy Consumption Models"
(→Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita) |
(→Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Macraes) |
||
Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
''Barns, K., Lane, G., Osten, K. & Scagliotta, N.'', '''Benchmarking Energy Efficiency - A Case Study at Macraes Gold Mine''', Proceedings of the AusIMM MetPlant conference, Perth, Australia, September 2004. |
''Barns, K., Lane, G., Osten, K. & Scagliotta, N.'', '''Benchmarking Energy Efficiency - A Case Study at Macraes Gold Mine''', Proceedings of the AusIMM MetPlant conference, Perth, Australia, September 2004. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Difference between model results and plant surveys: |
||
+ | {| class="wikitable" |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | ! !! !! Survey 5 !! Survey 4 !! Survey 3 !! Survey 2 !! Survey 1 !! Overall<br>Average |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | SAG specific power || ||-5.3% ||-5.0% || 6.3% || 0.5% || 2.2% || -0.2% |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | ball mill specific power || ||-6.3% ||-4.7% || 3.6% || 1.9% || 3.2% || -0.5% |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | total specific power || ||-6.8% ||-3.8% || 5.4% || 1.4% || 2.9% || -0.2% |
||
+ | |} |
||
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Macraes|Show details of benchmarking]] |
[[Benchmarking: Bond - Macraes|Show details of benchmarking]] |
Revision as of 06:06, 1 February 2014
Contents
- 1 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain
- 2 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox
- 3 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank
- 4 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita
- 5 Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Macraes
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Copper Mountain
- Morrison, R., Current Plant Conditions at Copper Mountain. Presentation to the BC/Yukon Branch Canadian Mineral Processors, November 29, 2012; Vancouver, Canada.
Result for default model conditions:
Tonnage | |
---|---|
Model | 1455 t/h |
Measured | 1600 t/h |
Difference | 145 t/h |
Difference | 9.5% |
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Fort Knox
- Magnuson, R.; Hallow, J.; Mosher, J.; Major, K., The Fort Knox Mill: Design, Commissioning and Operation. Proceedings of the SAG 2001 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Result for default model conditions:
Etotal | WiO | Tonnage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 11.95 | 16.60 | kWh/t | 1,522 | t/h |
Measured | 10.50 | 13.97 | kWh/t | 1,733 | t/h |
Difference | 1.45 | 2.63 | kWh/t | 211 | t/h |
Difference | 12.9% | 17.2% | 12.9% |
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Meadowbank
- Muteb, P. & Allaire, J., Meadowbank Mine Process Plant Throughput Increase, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
Paper describes a "sick" SAG mill and the changes made to "bring it to health". The "healthy" mill conditions benchmark as follows:
- Actual SAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 3,168 kW / 4,105 kW
- Actual daily average throughput: 500 tonnes/hour
- Predicted SAG/ball motor powers (at shell): 3,096 kW / 4,182 kW
- Predicted nominal throughput: 500 tonnes/hour (0% difference)
SAG | Ball Mill | total | |
---|---|---|---|
Measured specific energy consumption, kWh/t | 6.34 | 8.21 | 14.55 |
Predicted specific energy consumption, kWh/t | 6.19 | 8.36 | 14.55 |
Difference, kWh/t | -0.15 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
Difference, % | -2.3% | 1.8% | 0.0% |
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Santa Rita
Latchireddi, S. & Faria, E., Achievement of High Energy Efficiency in Grinding Mills at Santa Rita, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
Faria, E. & Latchireddi, S., Commissioning and Operation of Milling Circuit at Santa Rita Nickel Operation, Paper #137: Proceedings of the International Autogenous Grinding, Semiautogenous Grinding and High Pressure Grinding Roll Technology Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 2011.
FAG | BM | Pebble Crusher |
total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Measured specific energy consumption, kWh/t | 9.55 | 7.28 | 0.34 | 17.18 |
Predicted specific energy consumption, kWh/t | 9.78 | 8.33 | 0.39 | 18.50 |
Difference, kWh/t | 0.23 | 1.05 | 0.05 | 1.32 |
Difference, % | 2.4% | 14.4% | 14.7% | 7.7% |
Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt Circuit Specific Energy Consumption - Macraes
Barns, K., Lane, G., Osten, K. & Scagliotta, N., Benchmarking Energy Efficiency - A Case Study at Macraes Gold Mine, Proceedings of the AusIMM MetPlant conference, Perth, Australia, September 2004.
Difference between model results and plant surveys:
Survey 5 | Survey 4 | Survey 3 | Survey 2 | Survey 1 | Overall Average | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAG specific power | -5.3% | -5.0% | 6.3% | 0.5% | 2.2% | -0.2% | |
ball mill specific power | -6.3% | -4.7% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 3.2% | -0.5% | |
total specific power | -6.8% | -3.8% | 5.4% | 1.4% | 2.9% | -0.2% |