Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw Models"
(→Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Santa Rita) |
(→Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
==Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi== |
==Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi== |
||
− | * ''Villouta, R.M.'', '''Collahuasi: After years of operation''', Proceedings of the International Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding Technology conference (SAG 2001), Vancouver, Canada, Pages I-31 & |
+ | * ''Villouta, R.M.'', '''Collahuasi: After years of operation''', Proceedings of the International Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding Technology conference (SAG 2001), Vancouver, Canada, Pages I-31 – I-42 |
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" border="1" |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | ! |
||
+ | ! DCS Power, kW |
||
+ | ! Speed, % |
||
+ | of critical |
||
+ | ! Mill filling |
||
+ | ! Morrell Model, kW |
||
+ | ! Nordberg model, kW |
||
+ | (no density correction) |
||
+ | ! Nordberg model, kW |
||
+ | (density correction) |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | original |
||
+ | | 8900 |
||
+ | | 74% |
||
+ | | 35% v/v |
||
+ | | 9044 (+1.6%) |
||
+ | | [deduct 5%] 8183 (-8.8%) |
||
+ | | [deduct 5%] 8717 (-2.1%) |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | later |
||
+ | | 9200 |
||
+ | | 78% |
||
+ | | 35% v/v |
||
+ | | 9655 (+4.9%) |
||
+ | | [deduct 5%] 8890 (-3.5%) |
||
+ | | [deduct 5%] 9471 (+2.9%) |
||
+ | |} |
||
+ | All power values relative to DCS. |
||
[[Benchmarking: Collahuasi ball mill model|See details of benchmarking]] |
[[Benchmarking: Collahuasi ball mill model|See details of benchmarking]] |
Latest revision as of 16:57, 31 May 2014
Contents
Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Fimiston
- Nelson, M; Valery, W; Morrell, S, Performance Characteristics and Optimisation of the Fimiston (KCGM) SAG Mill Circuit, Page 233 - 248, SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Survey | Survey Power, kW at input |
Mill speed, %critical |
Total load, %v/v |
Pulp %solids, w/w |
Morrell SAG Model, kW at input / shell |
Nordberg Model, no density correction kW at input / shell |
Nordberg Model, density correction kW at input / shell |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survey 1 | 3,864 | 38.7 | 72.0 | 3,798 / 3,798 | 3,619 / 3,370 | 3,894 / 3,626 |
- Morrell model predicts 2% high
- Nordberg model predicts 7% low with no density correction and 0.8% high with density correction.
Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Meadowbank
- Muteb, P. & Allaire, J., Meadowbank Mine Process Plant Throughput Increase, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
DCS Power, kW | Mill filling | Morrell Model, kW | Nordberg model, kW
no density correction |
Nordberg model, kW
density correction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2012 | 4,341 | 30.6% v/v | 4,765 (+9.3%) | 4,426 (+1.9%) | 4,753 (+9.5%) |
Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Santa Rita
- Latchireddi, S. & Faria, E., Achievement of High Energy Efficiency in Grinding Mills at Santa Rita, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.
- Faria, E. & Latchireddi, S., Commissioning and Operation of Milling Circuit at Santa Rita Nickel Operation, Paper #137: Proceedings of the International Autogenous Grinding, Semiautogenous Grinding and High Pressure Grinding Roll Technology Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 2011.
DCS Power, kW | Mill filling | Morrell Model, kW | Nordberg model, kW
(no density correction) |
Nordberg model, kW
(density correction) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
July 2010 | 5085 | 27.5% v/v | 4979 (-2.1%) | 4706 (-8.1%) | 5083 (0.0%) |
Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi
- Villouta, R.M., Collahuasi: After years of operation, Proceedings of the International Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding Technology conference (SAG 2001), Vancouver, Canada, Pages I-31 – I-42
DCS Power, kW | Speed, %
of critical |
Mill filling | Morrell Model, kW | Nordberg model, kW
(no density correction) |
Nordberg model, kW
(density correction) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
original | 8900 | 74% | 35% v/v | 9044 (+1.6%) | [deduct 5%] 8183 (-8.8%) | [deduct 5%] 8717 (-2.1%) |
later | 9200 | 78% | 35% v/v | 9655 (+4.9%) | [deduct 5%] 8890 (-3.5%) | [deduct 5%] 9471 (+2.9%) |
All power values relative to DCS.