Difference between revisions of "Specific energy consumption models"

From SAGMILLING.COM
Jump to: navigation, search
(Bond/Barratt Models)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
These models are based on the work of Bond[[Bibliography:_Specific_energy_consumption_models|<sup>[1]</sup>]] and Rowland[[Bibliography:_Specific_energy_consumption_models|<sup>[2]</sup>]]. They pre-date the wide adoption of SAG milling and can be considered "classical" models.
 
These models are based on the work of Bond[[Bibliography:_Specific_energy_consumption_models|<sup>[1]</sup>]] and Rowland[[Bibliography:_Specific_energy_consumption_models|<sup>[2]</sup>]]. They pre-date the wide adoption of SAG milling and can be considered "classical" models.
   
  +
These models require either a sub-set or all three of Bond work index values: [[Testwork: Bond crushing work index|Low-energy impact crushing work index]], [[Testwork: Bond rod mill work index|rod mill work index]] and [[Testwork: Bond ball mill work index|ball mill work index]].
* Rod mill - ball mill (coming soon)
 
  +
  +
* [[Model:Bond RMBM Model|Classical Rod mill - ball mill circuit]]
 
* [[Model:BondSSBMModel|Single stage ball milling]]
 
* [[Model:BondSSBMModel|Single stage ball milling]]
   
 
== Bond/Barratt Models ==
 
== Bond/Barratt Models ==
  +
These models require the three Bond work index values: [[Testwork: Bond crushing work index|Low-energy impact crushing work index]], [[Testwork: Bond rod mill work index|rod mill work index]] and [[Testwork: Bond ball mill work index|ball mill work index]].
  +
* [[Model:BondModel|(Default) Optimized Bond/Barratt Model SABC]] (including [[phantom cyclone]])
  +
* [[Model:BondModelSAB|(Default) Optimized Bond/Barratt Model SAB]] (including [[phantom cyclone]])
 
* [[Model:RawBondModel|Raw Bond/Barratt Model]] (no [[phantom cyclone]])
 
* [[Model:RawBondModel|Raw Bond/Barratt Model]] (no [[phantom cyclone]])
  +
The Optimized model should be used in most situations. The Raw model is provided for situations with especially hard rock that is difficult to SAG mill – specifically situations where the crushing work index or rod mill work index is significantly greater than the ball mill work index.
* [[Model:BondModel|Default Bond/Barratt Model SABC]] (including [[phantom cyclone]])
 
* [[Model:BondModelSAB|Default Bond/Barratt Model SAB]] (including [[phantom cyclone]])
 
   
 
== Bond + Pilot Plant Models ==
 
== Bond + Pilot Plant Models ==
  +
'''warning - experimental model'''
* [[Model:HPGR and ball mill|HPGR and ball mill]] (using Bond )
 
  +
  +
This models requires an HPGR pilot plant test (bench-scale HPGR tests also work) plus the three Bond work index values: [[Testwork: Bond crushing work index|Low-energy impact crushing work index]], [[Testwork: Bond rod mill work index|rod mill work index]] and [[Testwork: Bond ball mill work index|ball mill work index]].
  +
* [[Model:HPGR and ball mill|HPGR and ball mill]] (using Bond and an HPGR pilot plant)
  +
  +
== SMC Model ==
  +
This model requires the two Mi results: [[Testwork: Drop weight test|SMC test]] giving Mia values, and [[Testwork: Bond ball mill work index|ball mill work index]] details (P<sub>80</sub>, F<sub>80</sub>, etc.) giving Mib values.
  +
  +
* [[Model:Morrell SMC SAG]] SAB and SABC
  +
  +
== SGI Model ==
  +
This model requires: [[Testwork: SAG grindability index|SAG Grindability Index]] (SGI or SPI™), and [[Testwork: Bond ball mill work index|ball mill work index]].
   
  +
* [[Model:Amelunxen SGI]] SAB and SABC (similar to SPI™)
== SMC Models ==
 
* Default SMC model (coming soon)
 

Latest revision as of 19:12, 9 March 2020

Specific Energy Consumption Models

Specific Energy Consumption is the most common way of describing how much energy is used by grinding, and is the basis of the throughput estimations in SAGMILLING.COM. It is usually expressed as kWh/t (kilowatt-hours per tonne).

Models of this type assume a standard particle size distribution and use a single position on that particle size distribution to characterize the entire curve. The most common way to express this is the 80% passing size, which can be expressed as F80 (feed stream 80% passing size), P80 (product stream 80% passing size), or K80 (generic stream 80% passing size. Bond (1952)[1] describes the rationale for using a single 80% passing size and indicative of the whole size range.

Models are arranged into classes, depending on the theory they are implementing. The models within a class usually almost entirely the same except that each implement a particular feature or default setting.

Bond Models

These models are based on the work of Bond[1] and Rowland[2]. They pre-date the wide adoption of SAG milling and can be considered "classical" models.

These models require either a sub-set or all three of Bond work index values: Low-energy impact crushing work index, rod mill work index and ball mill work index.

Bond/Barratt Models

These models require the three Bond work index values: Low-energy impact crushing work index, rod mill work index and ball mill work index.

The Optimized model should be used in most situations. The Raw model is provided for situations with especially hard rock that is difficult to SAG mill – specifically situations where the crushing work index or rod mill work index is significantly greater than the ball mill work index.

Bond + Pilot Plant Models

warning - experimental model

This models requires an HPGR pilot plant test (bench-scale HPGR tests also work) plus the three Bond work index values: Low-energy impact crushing work index, rod mill work index and ball mill work index.

SMC Model

This model requires the two Mi results: SMC test giving Mia values, and ball mill work index details (P80, F80, etc.) giving Mib values.

SGI Model

This model requires: SAG Grindability Index (SGI or SPI™), and ball mill work index.