Benchmarking: Bond - Esperanza

From SAGMILLING.COM
Revision as of 22:50, 9 January 2015 by Alex Doll (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt SAG Mill Specific Energy Consumption - Esperanza

  • Villanueva, F. and Soto, L., SEC and the impact on a mills selection for DMC project. Proceedings of the XXVII International Mineral Processing Congress, October 2014, Santiago, Chile. C14-23.

Paper describes modelling of two expansion cases (Esperanza Sur and Encuentro). Some operating data for the current Esperanza pit & plant are provided as they were used to tune the comminution models used for the expansion cases.

Design Criteria

Actual operating data from Esperanza

  • A×b of Esperanza ore (Aug-Dec 2012); avg= 39; range is 30.7 to 45.5.
  • WiBM average is 16.0 kWh/st, = 17.6 kWh/tonne.
  • ESAG for "normal" blasting, average = 5.2 kWh/tonne; range is 3.9 to 7.2 kWh/tonne.
  • ESAG for "high intensity" blasting typically 10% lower ESAG.
  • SAG feed size range 33.6% to 49.0 percent passing 1¼ inch (32 mm).

A relationship for ESAG (as kWh/tonne) to A×b is given for Esperanza operating data:

E_{SAG} = 22,548 (A \times b)^{-0.356}

No EBM or Etotal data is provided in the paper.

Design criteria for expansion cases (which may reflect Esperanza operating conditions)

  • SAG circuit F80 = 132 mm
  • transfer T80 = 3500 µm (text erroneously says "3500 mm")
  • BM circuit P80 = 180 µm
  • SAG mill power utilization = 92.3%
  • Ball mill power utilization = 95%
  • Plant availability = 93%

Mill criteria

  • SAG mill: 40 foot nom dia by 26 foot flange-to-flange cylinder length
  • ball mill: 27 foot nom dia by 45 foot flange-to-flange cylinder length (2 units)
  • SAG mill gearless motor 31,500 HP (given in Thiele & Parraguez, Relpas 2011 conference)
  • Ball mill gearless motors 25,000 HP

(some references give 30,000 HP for SAG motor; this is thought to be the value excluding a 5% design margin)

Modelling

The Bond/Barratt SABC-B model is used with the default 10% Essbm calibration factor.

  • circuit F80 = 132 mm
  • circuit P80 = 180 µm
  • The average ball mill work index given as 16 kWh/short ton = 17.6 kWh/tonne
  • The relationship between A×b and WiRM for Andean copper porphyries can be used to determine the following rod mill work index values.
    • A×b of Esperanza ore; avg= 39; becomes WiRM=14.5 kWh/tonne
  • No crushing work index is given. Assume a value of 12 kWh/tonne (slightly higher than typical porphyry)
  • No ore density is given. Assume similar to Los Bronces, density=2.64 t/m³

SAG mill is modelled using following:

  • Austin model
  • assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
  • nominal diameter 40 foot, effective grinding length 26 foot (deduct 2 ft from cylinder length)
  • assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
  • ball charge 16% v/v; total filling 26% v/v gives the desired 92.4% utilization of motor power

Ball mill is modelled using following:

  • Nordberg wet overflow model
  • assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
  • nominal diameter 27 foot, effective grinding length 44.5 foot (deduct 6 inches from cylinder length)
  • assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
  • total filling 30% v/v gives the desired 95% utilization of motor power

Results

Only one ball mill work index is provided, claimed to be the 'average'. The predictions of the min/max range are dubious because the ball mill work index should change between hard and soft ore.

Average ore
Measured SAG specific energy consumption, kWh/t
Predicted SAG specific energy consumption, kWh/t
Difference, kWh/t
Difference, %