Benchmarking: Bond - Esperanza: Difference between revisions

From SAGMILLING.COM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "category:benchmarking ==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt SAG Mill Specific Energy Consumption - Esperanza == * ''Villanueva, F. and Soto, L.'', '''SEC and the impact on a mills ..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[category:benchmarking]]
[[category:benchmarking]]
[[category:Bond/Barratt Model]]
[[category:Bibliography]]
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt SAG Mill Specific Energy Consumption - Esperanza ==
==Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt SAG Mill Specific Energy Consumption - Esperanza ==
* ''Villanueva, F. and Soto, L.'', '''SEC and the impact on a mills selection for DMC project'''. Proceedings of the XXVII International Mineral Processing Congress, October 2014, Santiago, Chile. C14-23.
* ''Villanueva, F. and Soto, L.'', '''SEC and the impact on a mills selection for DMC project'''. Proceedings of the XXVII International Mineral Processing Congress, October 2014, Santiago, Chile. C14-23.

Paper describes modelling of two expansion cases (Esperanza Sur and Encuentro). Some operating data for the current Esperanza pit & plant are provided as they were used to tune the comminution models used for the expansion cases.

==Design Criteria==
Actual operating data from Esperanza
* A×b of Esperanza ore (Aug-Dec 2012); avg= 39; range is 30.7 to 45.5.
* Wi<sub>BM</sub> average is 16.0 kWh/st, = 17.6 kWh/tonne.
* E<sub>SAG</sub> for "normal" blasting, average = 5.2 kWh/tonne; range is 3.9 to 7.2 kWh/tonne.
* E<sub>SAG</sub> for "high intensity" blasting typically 10% lower E<sub>SAG</sub>.
* SAG feed size range 33.6% to 49.0 percent passing 1&frac14; inch (32 mm).

A relationship for E<sub>SAG</sub> (as kWh/tonne) to A&times;b is given for Esperanza operating data:

<math>E_{SAG} = 22,548 (A \times b)^{-0.356} </math>

Design criteria for expansion cases (which may reflect Esperanza operating conditions)
* SAG circuit F<sub>80</sub> = 132 mm
* transfer T<sub>80</sub> = 3500 &micro;m (text erroneously says "3500 mm")
* BM circuit P<sub>80</sub> = 180 &micro;m
* SAG mill power utilization = 92.3%
* Ball mill power utilization = 95%
* Plant availability = 93%

Mill criteria
* SAG mill: 40 foot nom dia by 26 foot flange-to-flange cylinder length
* ball mill: 27 foot nom dia by 45 foot flange-to-flange cylinder length (2 units)
* SAG mill gearless motor 31,500 HP (given in Thiele & Parraguez, Relpas 2011 conference)
* Ball mill gearless motors 25,000 HP
(some references give 30,000 HP for SAG motor; this is thought to be the value excluding a 5% design margin)

==Modelling==

SAG mill is modelled using following:
* Austin model
* assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
* nominal diameter 40 foot, effective grinding length 26 foot (deduct 2 ft from cylinder length)
* assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
* ball charge 16% v/v; total filling 26% v/v gives the desired 92.4% utilization of motor power

Ball mill is modelled using following:
* Nordberg wet overflow model
* assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
* nominal diameter 27 foot, effective grinding length 44.5 foot (deduct 6 inches from cylinder length)
* assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
* total filling 30% v/v gives the desired 95% utilization of motor power

Revision as of 01:24, 9 January 2015

Benchmarking: Bond/Barratt SAG Mill Specific Energy Consumption - Esperanza

  • Villanueva, F. and Soto, L., SEC and the impact on a mills selection for DMC project. Proceedings of the XXVII International Mineral Processing Congress, October 2014, Santiago, Chile. C14-23.

Paper describes modelling of two expansion cases (Esperanza Sur and Encuentro). Some operating data for the current Esperanza pit & plant are provided as they were used to tune the comminution models used for the expansion cases.

Design Criteria

Actual operating data from Esperanza

  • A×b of Esperanza ore (Aug-Dec 2012); avg= 39; range is 30.7 to 45.5.
  • WiBM average is 16.0 kWh/st, = 17.6 kWh/tonne.
  • ESAG for "normal" blasting, average = 5.2 kWh/tonne; range is 3.9 to 7.2 kWh/tonne.
  • ESAG for "high intensity" blasting typically 10% lower ESAG.
  • SAG feed size range 33.6% to 49.0 percent passing 1¼ inch (32 mm).

A relationship for ESAG (as kWh/tonne) to A×b is given for Esperanza operating data:

ESAG=22,548(A×b)0.356

Design criteria for expansion cases (which may reflect Esperanza operating conditions)

  • SAG circuit F80 = 132 mm
  • transfer T80 = 3500 µm (text erroneously says "3500 mm")
  • BM circuit P80 = 180 µm
  • SAG mill power utilization = 92.3%
  • Ball mill power utilization = 95%
  • Plant availability = 93%

Mill criteria

  • SAG mill: 40 foot nom dia by 26 foot flange-to-flange cylinder length
  • ball mill: 27 foot nom dia by 45 foot flange-to-flange cylinder length (2 units)
  • SAG mill gearless motor 31,500 HP (given in Thiele & Parraguez, Relpas 2011 conference)
  • Ball mill gearless motors 25,000 HP

(some references give 30,000 HP for SAG motor; this is thought to be the value excluding a 5% design margin)

Modelling

SAG mill is modelled using following:

  • Austin model
  • assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
  • nominal diameter 40 foot, effective grinding length 26 foot (deduct 2 ft from cylinder length)
  • assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
  • ball charge 16% v/v; total filling 26% v/v gives the desired 92.4% utilization of motor power

Ball mill is modelled using following:

  • Nordberg wet overflow model
  • assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
  • nominal diameter 27 foot, effective grinding length 44.5 foot (deduct 6 inches from cylinder length)
  • assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
  • total filling 30% v/v gives the desired 95% utilization of motor power