Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking: Meadowbank ball mill model"

From SAGMILLING.COM
Jump to: navigation, search
(Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Meadowbank)
(Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Meadowbank)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
 
! Mill filling
 
! Mill filling
 
! Morrell Model, kW
 
! Morrell Model, kW
! Nordberg model, kW
 
density correction
 
 
! Nordberg model, kW
 
! Nordberg model, kW
 
no density correction
 
no density correction
  +
! Nordberg model, kW
  +
density correction
 
|-
 
|-
 
| May 2012
 
| May 2012
Line 36: Line 36:
 
| 30.6% v/v
 
| 30.6% v/v
 
| 4,765 (+9.3%)
 
| 4,765 (+9.3%)
| 4,753 (+9.5%)
 
 
| 4,426 (+1.9%)
 
| 4,426 (+1.9%)
  +
| 4,753 (+9.5%)
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 20:02, 26 January 2014

Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Meadowbank

  • Muteb, P. & Allaire, J., Meadowbank Mine Process Plant Throughput Increase, Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processors Annual General Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, January 2013.

The ball mill design given as:

  • Diameter inside shell: 18 ft
  • Length (assumed to be flange-to-flange length): 29 ft
  • Effective grinding length: 28.5 ft (using rule-of-thumb half-foot basis)
  • Motor size: 6,000 horsepower (4,474 kW)
  • Overflow mill with synchronous motor assumed

The operating conditions of the May 2012 survey, including the pre-crushing circuit given as:

  • Mill speed 14.19 rpm (75% critical)
  • Volumetric filling 30.6% v/v
  • Ball charge 30.6% v/v
  • Ore density 2.93 kg/L
  • Grindability: A×b 38.6; WiBM 10.9 kWh/t

Liners assumed to be an effective thickness of 3 inches. DCS power is assumed to be indicated (mill power measurements × 0.985 pinion × 0.96 motor eff equals power "at mill shell"). Model power measurements are shown "at DCS".

DCS Power, kW Mill filling Morrell Model, kW Nordberg model, kW

no density correction

Nordberg model, kW

density correction

May 2012 4,341 30.6% v/v 4,765 (+9.3%) 4,426 (+1.9%) 4,753 (+9.5%)