Model:Morrell HPGR and ball mill

Morrell SMC HPGR & ball mill Model

This is a secondary cone crusher, High Pressure Grinding Roll (HPGR) plus ball mill model that estimates the specific energy consumption using the equations of Morrell (GMSG, 2016).

Testwork Required

• The SMC™ test, stored in the "DWT" testwork table (SMC is a Drop Weight Test).
• Bond ball mill work index. The method requires all the elements of the ball mill work index test to be filled in:
  • Ball mill Wi test closing screen size, umclosing, µm
  • Ball mill Wi test product size, P₈₀, µm
  • Ball mill Wi test feed size, F₈₀, µm
  • Ball mill Wi grams per revolution at test conclusion, gpr

Required parameters

• F₈₀, µm is the 80% passing size of the fresh feed to the circuit, ie, primary crusher product (expected to be a Bond-compatible size distribution).
• Pc₈₀, µm is the 80% passing size of the secondary crusher product (expected to be a Bond-compatible size distribution).
• T₈₀, µm is the 80% passing size of the HPGR screen undersize, ie. ball mill circuit feed (expected to be a Bond-compatible size distribution).
• P₈₀, µm is the 80% passing size of the circuit product (expected to be a Bond-compatible size distribution).
• Availability, expressed as a decimal (0.90 = 90% availability) is used to convert t/h to t/d.

Optional parameters

• Description and Comment are optional text fields
• Maximum t/h limit is a t/h throughput above which a warning message is displayed (but does not actually limit the throughput).
• Conveyor lift height, used to estimate the specific energy consumption of the conveyors,

Formulae

The method is superficially similar to Bond (among other models), but with a variable exponent on size defined by:

$f(x) = - 0.295 - \frac{x}{10^6}$

Where x is the particle 80% passing size in µm.

Secondary crushing circuit, assumes secondary crusher operates in closed circuit with a screen:

$E_{secCrush} = 55 \times (Pc_{80} \times F_{80})^{-0.2} \times 4 \times Mic \left( Pc_{80}^{f(Pc_{80})} - F_{80}^{f(F_{80})} \right) \times 1.00$^{GMSG, 2016}

High pressure grinding roll circuit, assumes operating in closed circuit with a screen:

$E_{hpgr} = 35 \times (T_{80} \times Pc_{80})^{-0.2} \times 4 \times Mih \left( T_{80}^{f(T_{80})} - Pc_{80}^{f(Pc_{80})} \right) \times 1.00$^{GMSG, 2016}

Ball mill circuit:

$E_{ball} = 4 \times Mia \left( 750^{f(750)} - T_{80}^{f(T_{80})} \right) + 4 \times Mib \left( P_{80}^{f(P_{80})} - 750^{f(750)} \right)$^{GMSG, 2016}

Discussion

• This model requires that the product of the secondary crusher and HPGR be coarser than 750 µm. This is reasonable as no HPGR circuit operates anywhere near that size range (as of 2020).
• There is a minor correction required for open circuit secondary crushing (the 1.0 factor becomes 1.19). In theory, open circuit operation would change the particle size distribution of the cone crusher product affecting the load on the HPGR. The change in cone crusher specific energy consumption should be, for all practical purposes, completely offset by a change in the HPGR specific energy consumption.
• The estimation of dust collection is based on Doll, 2015 where E_dust = 0.5 kWh/t.
• The estimation of conveyor specific energy is based on Doll, 2015:

$E_{conveyor} = (Height,m \times 6) \times 2.724 \times 1.22 \times 1.85 / 1000$