Difference between revisions of "Bibliography: Benchmarking"
(→Mill Power Draw) |
(→Mill Power Draw) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Circuit Specific Energy Consumption=== |
===Circuit Specific Energy Consumption=== |
||
| − | == |
+ | ==Benchmarking: Mill Power Draw== |
* ''Nelson, M; Valery, W; Morrell, S'', '''Performance Characteristics and Optimisation of the Fimiston (KCGM) SAG Mill Circuit''', Page 233 - 248, SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada. |
* ''Nelson, M; Valery, W; Morrell, S'', '''Performance Characteristics and Optimisation of the Fimiston (KCGM) SAG Mill Circuit''', Page 233 - 248, SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada. |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
! Survey |
! Survey |
||
| − | ! Survey Power, |
+ | ! Survey Power,<br>kW at input |
| − | ! Mill speed, |
+ | ! Mill speed,<br>%critical |
| − | ! Ball load, |
+ | ! Ball load,<br>%v/v |
| − | ! Total load, |
+ | ! Total load,<br>%v/v |
| − | ! Pulp %solids, |
+ | ! Pulp %solids,<br>w/w |
| − | ! |
+ | ! Morrell SAG Model,<br>kW at input/shell |
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 1 |
| Survey 1 |
||
| − | | 9,255 |
+ | | '''9,255''' |
| 72.5 |
| 72.5 |
||
| 13 |
| 13 |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 2 |
| Survey 2 |
||
| − | | 10,374 |
+ | | '''10,374''' |
| 77 |
| 77 |
||
| 13 |
| 13 |
||
| 25.2 |
| 25.2 |
||
| 63.3 |
| 63.3 |
||
| − | | ''' |
+ | | '''10,230''' / 9,821 |
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 3 |
| Survey 3 |
||
| − | | 8,395 |
+ | | '''8,395''' |
| 75 |
| 75 |
||
| 15 |
| 15 |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 4 |
| Survey 4 |
||
| − | | 8,299 |
+ | | '''8,299''' |
| 78 |
| 78 |
||
| 11.5 |
| 11.5 |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 5 |
| Survey 5 |
||
| − | | 10,976 |
+ | | '''10,976''' |
| 80 |
| 80 |
||
| 11.5 |
| 11.5 |
||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 6 |
| Survey 6 |
||
| − | | 8,616 |
+ | | '''8,616''' |
| 74 |
| 74 |
||
| 11.5 |
| 11.5 |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 7 |
| Survey 7 |
||
| − | | 11,684 |
+ | | '''11,684''' |
| 82 |
| 82 |
||
| 14 |
| 14 |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 8 |
| Survey 8 |
||
| − | | 11,610 |
+ | | '''11,610''' |
| 78 |
| 78 |
||
| 13 |
| 13 |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 9 |
| Survey 9 |
||
| − | | 11,571 |
+ | | '''11,571''' |
| 78 |
| 78 |
||
| 13 |
| 13 |
||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Survey 10 |
| Survey 10 |
||
| − | | 9,408 |
+ | | '''9,408''' |
| 80 |
| 80 |
||
| 12 |
| 12 |
||
Revision as of 01:40, 11 November 2012
Contents
Bibliography: Benchmarking of models
The following list of references show data useful for benchmarking against the different models.
Circuit Specific Energy Consumption
Benchmarking: Mill Power Draw
- Nelson, M; Valery, W; Morrell, S, Performance Characteristics and Optimisation of the Fimiston (KCGM) SAG Mill Circuit, Page 233 - 248, SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
- Diameter inside shell = 10.970 m
- Diameter inside liners = 10.797 m
- Belly length inside liners (EGL) = 4.417 m
- Centre-line length = 6.920 m
Table 4 presents results of several SAG surveys at different speed and load conditions. The survey measured motor input power. Drives are assumed to have an efficiency of 0.96 and pinion efficiency of 0.985, so the model shell power draw is converted to motor input power by dividing by 0.9456.
| Survey | Survey Power, kW at input |
Mill speed, %critical |
Ball load, %v/v |
Total load, %v/v |
Pulp %solids, w/w |
Morrell SAG Model, kW at input/shell |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survey 1 | 9,255 | 72.5 | 13 | 21.6 | 65.9 | |
| Survey 2 | 10,374 | 77 | 13 | 25.2 | 63.3 | 10,230 / 9,821 |
| Survey 3 | 8,395 | 75 | 15 | 16.1 | 70 | |
| Survey 4 | 8,299 | 78 | 11.5 | 13.5 | 60 | |
| Survey 5 | 10,976 | 80 | 11.5 | 22.2 | 60 | |
| Survey 6 | 8,616 | 74 | 11.5 | 13.6 | 63 | |
| Survey 7 | 11,684 | 82 | 14 | 20 | 75 | |
| Survey 8 | 11,610 | 78 | 13 | 28.6 | 75 | |
| Survey 9 | 11,571 | 78 | 13 | 25.8 | 75 | |
| Survey 10 | 9,408 | 80 | 12 | 19 | 75 |
The predicted power draw of Example project sample circuit number 7 (Fimiston) using sample MLE, based on the KCGM paper published by Campbell, J. et al; 1998 AusIMM Annual Conference.
Historic & Other Interesting Benchmarking
- Myers, J.F., Michaelson, S.D., Bond, F.C., Rod Milling—Plant and Laboratory Data, Technical Publication No. 2175, American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, 1947. [1]
