Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking: Amelunxen SGI - Agnico Eagle"
(→Results) |
(→Design Criteria) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Design Criteria== |
==Design Criteria== |
||
− | Actual operating data from |
+ | Actual operating data, table 7 from the reference |
+ | * SAG circuit F<sub>80</sub> = 100 mm |
||
− | * A×b of Esperanza ore (Aug-Dec 2012); avg= 39; range is 30.7 to 45.5. |
||
− | * |
+ | * transfer T<sub>80</sub> = 244 µm |
+ | * circuit P<sub>80</sub> = 74 µm |
||
− | * E<sub>SAG</sub> for "normal" blasting, average = 5.5 kWh/tonne; range is 3.9 to 7.2 kWh/tonne. |
||
+ | * SAG power draw (at motor input) = 1350 kW (at mill shell = 1283 kW) |
||
− | * E<sub>SAG</sub> for "high intensity" blasting typically 10% lower E<sub>SAG</sub>. |
||
+ | * SAG mill ball charge = 10.6 % vol |
||
− | * SAG feed size range 33.6% to 49.0 percent passing 1¼ inch (32 mm). |
||
+ | * SAG mill discharge % solids = 84% weight |
||
+ | * SAG mill speed 8.59 RPM (53.4% of critical) |
||
+ | (to achieve DCS power of 1350 kW requires 14% vol mill load) |
||
+ | * ball mill power draw (sum of 2 mills, at motor input) = 1422 kW (at mill shell = 2 × 673 kW = 1346 kW) |
||
+ | * ball mill % solids = 83% weight |
||
+ | (to achieve 1422 kW, assume 30% vol mill charge, 17 RPM) |
||
+ | Design criteria |
||
− | Design criteria for expansion cases (which may reflect Esperanza operating conditions) |
||
+ | * SGI (actually SPI&tm;) of ore (Oct 1, 2000 to - April 30,2001); assumed to be the 25<sup>th</sup> percentile = 24 minutes. |
||
− | * SAG circuit F<sub>80</sub> = 132 mm |
||
− | * |
+ | * Wi<sub>BM</sub> assumed to be 10 kWh/tonne. |
+ | * Plant availability = 94.4% |
||
− | * BM circuit P<sub>80</sub> = 180 µm |
||
− | * SAG mill power utilization = 92.3% |
||
− | * Ball mill power utilization = 95% |
||
− | * Plant availability = 93% |
||
Mill criteria |
Mill criteria |
||
− | * SAG mill: |
+ | * SAG mill: 24 foot nom diam by 12 foot effective grinding length (EGL) |
− | * ball mill: |
+ | * ball mill: two 11 foot nom diam by 17 foot (assumed to be EGL) |
− | * SAG mill |
+ | * SAG mill single variable speed motor 4500 HP |
− | * Ball mill |
+ | * Ball mill single fixed speed motors 1000 HP (each mill) |
+ | * assume rubber liners in SAG, nominal 8½ inch liner thickness |
||
− | (some references give 30,000 HP for SAG motor; this is thought to be the value excluding a 5% design margin) |
||
+ | * assume steel liners in ball mills, nominal 3¼ inch liner thickness |
||
==Modelling== |
==Modelling== |
Revision as of 20:04, 19 May 2015
Contents
Benchmarking: Amelunxen SGI Specific Energy Consumption - Agnico Eagle Laronde
Starkey, J., Robitaille, J., Cousin, P., Jordan, J. and Kosick, G., Design of the Agnico-Eagle Laronde Division SAG mill. Proceedings of SAG 2001, pages III-165 to III-178.
Survey conducted shortly after start-up
Design Criteria
Actual operating data, table 7 from the reference
- SAG circuit F80 = 100 mm
- transfer T80 = 244 µm
- circuit P80 = 74 µm
- SAG power draw (at motor input) = 1350 kW (at mill shell = 1283 kW)
- SAG mill ball charge = 10.6 % vol
- SAG mill discharge % solids = 84% weight
- SAG mill speed 8.59 RPM (53.4% of critical)
(to achieve DCS power of 1350 kW requires 14% vol mill load)
- ball mill power draw (sum of 2 mills, at motor input) = 1422 kW (at mill shell = 2 × 673 kW = 1346 kW)
- ball mill % solids = 83% weight
(to achieve 1422 kW, assume 30% vol mill charge, 17 RPM)
Design criteria
- SGI (actually SPI&tm;) of ore (Oct 1, 2000 to - April 30,2001); assumed to be the 25th percentile = 24 minutes.
- WiBM assumed to be 10 kWh/tonne.
- Plant availability = 94.4%
Mill criteria
- SAG mill: 24 foot nom diam by 12 foot effective grinding length (EGL)
- ball mill: two 11 foot nom diam by 17 foot (assumed to be EGL)
- SAG mill single variable speed motor 4500 HP
- Ball mill single fixed speed motors 1000 HP (each mill)
- assume rubber liners in SAG, nominal 8½ inch liner thickness
- assume steel liners in ball mills, nominal 3¼ inch liner thickness
Modelling
The Bond/Barratt SABC-B model is used with the default 10% Essbm calibration factor.
- circuit F80 = 132 mm
- circuit P80 = 180 µm
- The average ball mill work index given as 16 kWh/short ton = 17.6 kWh/tonne
- The relationship between A×b and WiRM for Andean copper porphyries can be used to determine the following rod mill work index values.
- A×b of Esperanza ore; avg= 39; becomes WiRM=14.5 kWh/tonne
- No crushing work index is given. Assume a value of 12 kWh/tonne (slightly higher than typical porphyry)
- No ore density is given. Assume similar to Los Bronces, density=2.64 t/m³
SAG mill is modelled using following:
- Austin model
- assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
- nominal diameter 40 foot, effective grinding length 26 foot (deduct 2 ft from cylinder length)
- assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
- ball charge 16% v/v; total filling 26% v/v gives the desired 92.4% utilization of motor power
Ball mill is modelled using following:
- Nordberg wet overflow model
- assume ore density 2.64 t/m³, same as Los Bronces
- nominal diameter 27 foot, effective grinding length 44.5 foot (deduct 6 inches from cylinder length)
- assume 6 inch liner effective thickness, mill speed 75% of critical
- total filling 30% v/v gives the desired 95% utilization of motor power
Results
Result for default Amelunxen SGI SAB model conditions:
Esag | Epeb | Ebm | Etotal | t/h | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicted | - | ||||
Survey | - | ||||
Difference | - | ||||
Difference | - |