Difference between revisions of "Template:Tests by size class"

From SAGMILLING.COM
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
| Wi<sub>C</sub>
 
| Wi<sub>C</sub>
 
|-
 
|-
| SMC
+
| Morrell Mi (SMC)
 
| Mi<sub>b</sub>
 
| Mi<sub>b</sub>
 
| Mi<sub>a</sub>
 
| Mi<sub>a</sub>
Line 36: Line 36:
 
| &mdash;
 
| &mdash;
 
|}
 
|}
<sup>&dagger;</sup> The Mi<sub>c</sub> is not a true measurement of coarse hardness because the measurement is conducted at a medium size and extrapolated based on a database thought to consist of largely competent ores. It is unlikely to represent the hardness of heterogeneous ores where the breakage of coarse sizes is controlled by fractures rather than by the matrix of rock.
+
<sup>&dagger;</sup> The Mi<sub>c</sub> is not a true measurement of coarse hardness because the measurement is conducted at a medium size and extrapolated based on a database.
   
 
<sup>‡</sup> JK SimMet is actually a population-balance model rather than a power model. CEET 2 is a hybrid model having properties of a population-balance model and a power model. Both tend to be more complicated and have more "tuning factors" that are appropriate to fitting mill surveys as opposed to initial design. Specialized software is needed to operate both models.
 
<sup>‡</sup> JK SimMet is actually a population-balance model rather than a power model. CEET 2 is a hybrid model having properties of a population-balance model and a power model. Both tend to be more complicated and have more "tuning factors" that are appropriate to fitting mill surveys as opposed to initial design. Specialized software is needed to operate both models.

Latest revision as of 18:49, 25 March 2023

Model Fine size Medium size Coarse size
Bond/Barratt WiBM WiRM WiC
Morrell Mi (SMC) Mib Mia Mic
SAGDesign WiBM(modified) SAGDesign
CEET 1 WiBM SPI
CEET 2 WiBM SPI CI
JK SimMet WiBM, ta A, b

The Mic is not a true measurement of coarse hardness because the measurement is conducted at a medium size and extrapolated based on a database.

JK SimMet is actually a population-balance model rather than a power model. CEET 2 is a hybrid model having properties of a population-balance model and a power model. Both tend to be more complicated and have more "tuning factors" that are appropriate to fitting mill surveys as opposed to initial design. Specialized software is needed to operate both models.