Difference between revisions of "Template:Tests by size class"
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! Model ! Fine size ! Medium size ! Coarse size |- | Bond/Barratt | Wi<sub>BM</sub> | Wi<sub>RM</sub> | Wi<sub>C</sub> |- | SMC | Mi<sub>b</...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Wi<sub>C</sub> |
| Wi<sub>C</sub> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
− | | SMC |
+ | | Morrell Mi (SMC) |
| Mi<sub>b</sub> |
| Mi<sub>b</sub> |
||
| Mi<sub>a</sub> |
| Mi<sub>a</sub> |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| — |
| — |
||
|} |
|} |
||
− | <sup>†</sup> The Mi<sub>c</sub> is not a true measurement of coarse hardness because the measurement is conducted at a medium size and extrapolated based on a database |
+ | <sup>†</sup> The Mi<sub>c</sub> is not a true measurement of coarse hardness because the measurement is conducted at a medium size and extrapolated based on a database. |
− | <sup>‡</sup> JK SimMet is actually a population-balance model rather than |
+ | <sup>‡</sup> JK SimMet is actually a population-balance model rather than a power model. CEET 2 is a hybrid model having properties of a population-balance model and a power model. Both tend to be more complicated and have more "tuning factors" that are appropriate to fitting mill surveys as opposed to initial design. Specialized software is needed to operate both models. |
Latest revision as of 17:49, 25 March 2023
Model | Fine size | Medium size | Coarse size |
---|---|---|---|
Bond/Barratt | WiBM | WiRM | WiC |
Morrell Mi (SMC) | Mib | Mia | Mic † |
SAGDesign | WiBM(modified) | SAGDesign | — |
CEET 1 | WiBM | SPI | — |
CEET 2 ‡ | WiBM | SPI | CI |
JK SimMet ‡ | WiBM, ta | A, b | — |
† The Mic is not a true measurement of coarse hardness because the measurement is conducted at a medium size and extrapolated based on a database.
‡ JK SimMet is actually a population-balance model rather than a power model. CEET 2 is a hybrid model having properties of a population-balance model and a power model. Both tend to be more complicated and have more "tuning factors" that are appropriate to fitting mill surveys as opposed to initial design. Specialized software is needed to operate both models.