Work Index - Revision history

Alex Doll: /* Bond Work Index */

2025-10-08T13:27:09Z

Bond Work Index

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 8 October 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	The Bond Work Index is an empirical calibration of comminution equipment specific energy consumption at different size classes. Three types of work index are ore hardness laboratory tests that can be used to design industrial grinding equipment.		The Bond Work Index is an empirical calibration of comminution equipment specific energy consumption at different size classes. Three types of work index are ore hardness laboratory tests that can be used to design industrial grinding equipment.

	There are five types of Work Index:		There are five types of Work Index, per the following subsections.

	===Ball mill work index===		===Ball mill work index===
	This is a laboratory measurement used to determine the ore grindability in the particle size range typically encountered by ball mills.		This is a laboratory measurement used to determine the ore grindability in the particle size range typically encountered by ball mills.

Alex Doll: /* The Units of Work Index */

2025-10-08T12:56:45Z

The Units of Work Index

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 8 October 2025
Line 34:		Line 34:
	The modern units of work index are '''kW·h·µm<sup>½</sup>·tonne<sup>-1</sup>''' and are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption (kWh/t).		The modern units of work index are '''kW·h·µm<sup>½</sup>·tonne<sup>-1</sup>''' and are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption (kWh/t).

			=== Basis ===
⚫	The unfortunate common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect ~~the~~ underlying physics.

	The Third Theory equation is:		The Third Theory equation is:
	<math>E = \frac{kW}{(t/h)} =10 \times Wi \times \left(P_{80}^{-0.5} - F_{80}^{-0.5} \right)</math>		<math>E = \frac{kW}{(t/h)} =10 \times Wi \times \left(P_{80}^{-0.5} - F_{80}^{-0.5} \right)</math>

			The modern interpretation of work index is as follows:
⚫	* If the ''10'' in the Third Theory is interpreted as the square-root of 100, a "typical product size" of ball milling operations,
⚫	* then the units of the size term (P₈₀<sup>-½</sup>-F₈₀<sup>-½</sup>) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).

⚫	This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. Errors in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake. ~~To prevent this error in the future, use the modern interpretation of work index where that the units are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption, as follows:~~

	* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor		* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor
	* the Work Index be treated as a coefficient related to the ''derivative of Specific Energy Consumption'' with particle size.		* the Work Index be treated as a coefficient related to the ''derivative of Specific Energy Consumption'' with particle size.

	In this interpretation, the units of work index become '''kW·h·µm<sup>½</sup>·t<sup>-1</sup>'''. The values obtained will be relative to the type of ton/tonne measured; the original work by Bond was performed in US short tons (907 kg) or US long tons (1016 kg), but all modern work uses the basis of metric tonnes (1000 kg).		In this interpretation, the units of work index become '''kW·h·µm<sup>½</sup>·t<sup>-1</sup>''' and the units of work index are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption. The values obtained will be relative to the type of ton/tonne measured; the original work by Bond was performed in US short tons (907 kg) or US long tons (1016 kg), but all modern work uses the basis of metric tonnes (1000 kg).

			=== History ===
		⚫	The unfortunate common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect any underlying physics.

		⚫	* If the ''10'' in the Third Theory is interpreted as the square-root of 100 µm, a "typical product size" of ball milling operations,
		⚫	* then the units of the size term (P₈₀<sup>-½</sup>-F₈₀<sup>-½</sup>) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).

		⚫	This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. Errors in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake.

Alex Doll: /* The Units of Work Index */

2025-10-08T12:43:06Z

The Units of Work Index

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 8 October 2025
Line 42:		Line 42:
	* then the units of the size term (P₈₀<sup>-½</sup>-F₈₀<sup>-½</sup>) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).		* then the units of the size term (P₈₀<sup>-½</sup>-F₈₀<sup>-½</sup>) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).

	This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. Errors in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake. To prevent this error in the future, it is ~~suggested that the~~ interpretation of work index ~~change so~~ that the units are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption, as follows:		This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. Errors in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake. To prevent this error in the future, use the modern interpretation of work index where that the units are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption, as follows:

	* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor		* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor

Alex Doll: /* The Units of Work Index */

2025-10-08T12:41:45Z

The Units of Work Index

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 8 October 2025
Line 32:		Line 32:

	==The Units of Work Index==		==The Units of Work Index==
			The modern units of work index are '''kW·h·µm<sup>½</sup>·tonne<sup>-1</sup>''' and are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption (kWh/t).

	The unfortunate common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect the underlying physics.		The unfortunate common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect the underlying physics.

Alex Doll: /* The Units of Work Index */

2025-10-08T12:39:55Z

The Units of Work Index

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 8 October 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:
	==The Units of Work Index==		==The Units of Work Index==

	The common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect the underlying physics.		The unfortunate common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect the underlying physics.

	The Third Theory equation is:		The Third Theory equation is:
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* then the units of the size term (P₈₀<sup>-½</sup>-F₈₀<sup>-½</sup>) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).		* then the units of the size term (P₈₀<sup>-½</sup>-F₈₀<sup>-½</sup>) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).

	This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. ~~Many errors~~ in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake. To prevent this error in the future, it is suggested that the interpretation of work index be as follows:		This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. Errors in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake. To prevent this error in the future, it is suggested that the interpretation of work index change so that the units are distinct from Specific Energy Consumption, as follows:

	* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor		* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor
	* the Work Index be treated as a coefficient related to the ''derivative of Specific Energy Consumption'' with particle size.		* the Work Index be treated as a coefficient related to the ''derivative of Specific Energy Consumption'' with particle size.

	In this interpretation, the units of work index become ~~<math>~~kW·h·~~%micro;~~m~~^{%half;}~~t^{-1}</~~math~~>. The values obtained will be relative to the type of ton/tonne measured; the original work by Bond was performed in US short tons (907 kg) or US long tons (1016 kg), but all modern work uses the basis of metric tonnes (1000 kg).		In this interpretation, the units of work index become '''kW·h·µm<sup>½</sup>·t<sup>-1</sup>'''. The values obtained will be relative to the type of ton/tonne measured; the original work by Bond was performed in US short tons (907 kg) or US long tons (1016 kg), but all modern work uses the basis of metric tonnes (1000 kg).

Alex Doll: Created page with "category:Testwork category:Work Index ==Bond Work Index== The Bond Work Index is an empirical calibration of comminution equipment specific energy consumption at diffe..."

2025-10-08T12:31:15Z

Created page with "category:Testwork category:Work Index ==Bond Work Index== The Bond Work Index is an empirical calibration of comminution equipment specific energy consumption at diffe..."

New page

[[category:Testwork]]
[[category:Work Index]]
==Bond Work Index==
The Bond Work Index is an empirical calibration of comminution equipment specific energy consumption at different size classes. Three types of work index are ore hardness laboratory tests that can be used to design industrial grinding equipment.

There are five types of Work Index:
===Ball mill work index===
This is a laboratory measurement used to determine the ore grindability in the particle size range typically encountered by ball mills.
[[Testwork:_Bond_ball_mill_work_index]]

===Rod mill work index===
This is a laboratory measurement used to determine the ore grindability in the particle size range typically encountered by rod mills, which were common grinding equipment in the mid twentieth century.
[[Testwork:_Bond_rod_mill_work_index]]

===Crushing work index===
Also called the '''Low Energy Impact Test''' (LEIT), this is a laboratory measurement used to determine the ore crusability in the particle size range typically encountered by cone crushers.
[[Testwork:_Bond_crushing_work_index]]

===Operating work index===
This is a generic work index measured on an arbitrary piece of comminution equipment. Computing the operating work index requires the following measurements for the equipment:
* the fresh feed rate in dry tonnes per hour (excluding any circulating load), '''t/h'''
* the mechanical power consumed by the equipment at the equipment input (kW at the mill shell or pinion), '''kW'''
* the fresh feed 80% passing size in µm, F80
* the classified product 80% passing size in µm, P80

The Operating Work Index (WiO) is calculated as follows:

<math>Wi_{O} = \frac{kW / (t/h)}{10 \times \left(P_{80}^{-0.5} - F_{80}^{-0.5} \right)}</math>

===Work Index (generic)===
The most generic definition of Work Index is that it is one-tenth of the coefficient of the special case of the [[Bibliography:_Specific_energy_consumption_models|Hukki Conjecture ]] where the exponent is fixed at –½. The Hukki Conjecture is a continuum of grindability models that link the Work Index to other models like the SGI model, Rittinger, Kick, and Signature Plots.

==The Units of Work Index==

The common practice in the industry is to give Work Index the same units as specific energy consumption, specifically ''kWh/t''. This is due to how the Third Theory equation was empirically calibrated and does not reflect the underlying physics.

The Third Theory equation is:
<math>E = \frac{kW}{(t/h)} =10 \times Wi \times \left(P_{80}^{-0.5} - F_{80}^{-0.5} \right)</math>

* If the ''10'' in the Third Theory is interpreted as the square-root of 100, a "typical product size" of ball milling operations,
* then the units of the size term (P₈₀-½-F₈₀-½) cancel the units of the coefficient (10).

This has the unwanted suggestion that Work Index is additive with Specific Energy Consumption, which it is not. Many errors in technical documents have been caused by inexperienced engineers making this mistake. To prevent this error in the future, it is suggested that the interpretation of work index be as follows:

* the ''10'' is a unitless scaling factor
* the Work Index be treated as a coefficient related to the ''derivative of Specific Energy Consumption'' with particle size.

In this interpretation, the units of work index become <math>kW·h·%micro;m^{%half;}t^{-1}</math>. The values obtained will be relative to the type of ton/tonne measured; the original work by Bond was performed in US short tons (907 kg) or US long tons (1016 kg), but all modern work uses the basis of metric tonnes (1000 kg).