Bibliography: Specific energy consumption models - Revision history

Alex Doll: /* SMC Model Bibliography */

2023-07-20T15:51:45Z

SMC Model Bibliography

Alex Doll: /* Bibliography of Other Useful Documents */

2020-04-13T19:54:22Z

Bibliography of Other Useful Documents

Alex Doll: /* Bond/Barratt Model Bibliography */

2018-07-29T17:44:14Z

Bond/Barratt Model Bibliography

Alex Doll: /* Bibliography of Other Useful Documents */

2016-09-28T18:16:26Z

Bibliography of Other Useful Documents

Alex Doll at 18:07, 22 April 2016

2016-04-22T18:07:38Z

Alex Doll: /* Bond/Barratt Model Bibliography */

2016-03-19T18:45:57Z

Bond/Barratt Model Bibliography

Alex Doll: /* Bibliography of Other Useful Documents */

2016-03-19T18:43:59Z

Bibliography of Other Useful Documents

Alex Doll: /* Bibliography of Other Useful Documents */

2016-03-19T18:42:11Z

Bibliography of Other Useful Documents

Alex Doll: /* Bibliography of Other Useful Documents */

2015-09-06T18:29:27Z

Bibliography of Other Useful Documents

Alex Doll: /* Bibliography: Specific Energy Consumption Models */

2015-06-23T20:36:39Z

Bibliography: Specific Energy Consumption Models

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 === SMC Model Bibliography ===
-# ''Morrell, Stephen'', '''An alternative energy&mdash;size relationship to that proposed by Bond for the design and optmisation of grinding circuits''', International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol 74 (2004), Pages 133 - 141
+# ''Morrell, Stephen'', '''An alternative energy&mdash;size relationship to that proposed by Bond for the design and optimisation of grinding circuits''', International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol 74 (2004), Pages 133 - 141
 # ''smctesting.com'', '''Using the SMC&reg; Test to Predict Comminution Circuit Performance''', [http://www.smctesting.com/about Published to the Internet ]
 # ''Morrell, Stephen'', '''The appropriateness of the transfer size in AG and SAG mill circuit design''', SAG 2011 Conference, Paper #153. Vancouver, Canada.
 # ''Global Mining Standards Group'', '''Guideline description: Morrell method for determining comminution circuit specific energy and assessing energy utilization efficiency of existing circuits''', revision dated April 07, 2016 (issued for approval).
 === Starkey SAGDesign Model Bibliography ===

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 # ed. ''Kawatra, S. K.'', '''Advances in Comminution''', [http://smemi.personifycloud.com/PersonifyEbusiness/Store/ProductDetails.aspx?productId=116864 SME, 2006]
 # ''Doll, A.G.'', '''A simple estimation method of materials handling specific energy consumption in HPGR circuits''', Proceedings of the AGM of the Canadian Mineral Processors, January, 2015, Ottawa, Canada. (republished as a poster in Procemin 2015, Santiago, Chile).  https://www.sagmilling.com/articles/23/view/?s=1
 Levin (1992) describes three different circuit designs (RM/PM, BM/PM, SAG) on similar Wits. gold ores. Wi<sub>O</sub> difference between SAG and RM/PM is about 10%.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 # ''Rowland, Chester A'', '''Bond's Method for Selection of Ball Mills''', Advances in Comminution, ed. S. K. Kawatra, SME 2006, Pages 385 - 397
 ## EF factor formulae are taken from ''Rowland, Chester A'', '''Selection of Rod Mills, Ball Mills and Regrind Mills''', Mineral Processing Plant Design, Practice & Control, SME 2002, Pages 710-754.
-# ''Barratt, Derek J'', '''Semi-autogenous grinding: a comparison with the conventional route''', CIM Bulletin, Nov 1979, Pages 74 - 80. [http://www.cim.org/en/Publications-and-Technical-Resources/Publications/Technical_Papers/1979/11/BULL-1979-11-06.aspx]
+# ''Barratt, Derek J'', '''Semi-autogenous grinding: a comparison with the conventional route''', CIM Bulletin, Nov 1979, Pages 74 - 80. [http://www.OneMine.org/document/abstract.cfm?docid=215061 OneMine link]
 # ''Barratt, Derek J'', '''An Update on Testing, Scale-up and Sizing Equipment for Autogenous and Semi-autogenous Grinding Circuits''', Proceedings of the SAG 1989 Conference, Vancouver, Canada, Pages 25 - 46,

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 === Bibliography of Other Useful Documents ===
 # ''Taggart, A. F.'', '''Handbook of Mineral Dressing''', Wiley Engineering Handbook Series, original 1927, republished 1945, 1948, 1950, 1953
 # ''Lynch, A. J.'' and ''Rowland, C. A'', '''The History of Grinding''', [http://smemi.personifycloud.com/PersonifyEbusiness/Store/ProductDetails.aspx?productId=116847 SME, 2005]
 # ed. ''Kawatra, S. K.'', '''Advances in Comminution''', [http://smemi.personifycloud.com/PersonifyEbusiness/Store/ProductDetails.aspx?productId=116864 SME, 2006]
 # ''Doll, A.G.'', '''A simple estimation method of materials handling specific energy consumption in HPGR circuits''', Proceedings of the AGM of the Canadian Mineral Processors, January, 2015, Ottawa, Canada. (republished as a poster in Procemin 2015, Santiago, Chile).  https://www.sagmilling.com/articles/23/view/?s=1
 Vanderbeek (1996) describes the effect of pebble crushing and SABC-AB operation as reducing the Esag between 10% and 35% at Chino, but at a cost of coarser ball mill product.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Specific Energy Consumption is the most common way of describing how much energy is used by grinding, and is the basis of the throughput estimations in SAGMILLING.COM.  It is usually expressed as kWh/t (kilowatt-hours per tonne).
-Models of this type assume a [[standard particle size distribution]] and use a single position on that particle size distribution to characterize the entire curve.  The most common way to express this is the 80% passing size, which can be expressed as ''F<sub>80</sub>'' (feed stream 80% passing size), ''P<sub>80</sub>'' (product stream 80% passing size), or ''K<sub>80</sub>'' (generic stream 80% passing size).
+Models of this type generally assume a [[standard particle size distribution]] and use a single position on that particle size distribution to characterize the entire curve.  The most common way to express this is the 80% passing size, which can be expressed as ''F<sub>80</sub>'' (feed stream 80% passing size), ''P<sub>80</sub>'' (product stream 80% passing size), or ''K<sub>80</sub>'' (generic stream 80% passing size).
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 # ''smctesting.com'', '''Using the SMC&reg; Test to Predict Comminution Circuit Performance''', [http://www.smctesting.com/about Published to the Internet ]
 # ''Morrell, Stephen'', '''The appropriateness of the transfer size in AG and SAG mill circuit design''', SAG 2011 Conference, Paper #153. Vancouver, Canada.
@@ Line 49: / Line 50: @@
 # ''Vanderbeek, J.'', '''Grinding circuit evolution at Chino Mines Company''', Proceedings of the SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
 # ''Bird, D.S., Heig, R.A., Harper, R.W. and Berges, A.M.'', '''Kennecott's Copperton Concentrator Fourth Line Expansion, Plant Performance to Date and Ongoing Continuous Improvement Projects''', Proceedings of the SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
 Vanderbeek (1996) describes the effect of pebble crushing and SABC-AB operation as reducing the Esag between 10% and 35% at Chino, but at a cost of coarser ball mill product.

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 === Bibliography of Other Useful Documents ===
-# ''Hukki, R. T.'', '''Proposal for a Solomonic Settlement Between the Theories of Von Rittinger, Kick and Bond''', Transactions AIME, Vol 223, 1962, Pages 403 - 408 [http://www.onemine.org/search/summary.cfm/Minerals-Beneficiation--Proposal-for-a-Solomonic-Settlement-Between-the-Theories-of-von-Rittinger-Kick-and-Bond?d=A99895D9FE34D3C9A0CD3EE0354AC37E1C182353BD8D607F1360FC8901D8DBE524161]
+# ''Hukki, R. T.'', '''Proposal for a Solomonic Settlement Between the Theories of Von Rittinger, Kick and Bond''', Transactions AIME, Vol 223, 1962, Pages 403 - 408 [http://www.onemine.org/document/abstract.cfm?docid=24161&title=Minerals-Beneficiation--Proposal-for-a-Solomonic-Settlement-Between-the-Theories-of-von-Rittinger-Kick-and-Bond OneMine link]
-# ''Charles, R.J.'', '''Energy-Size Reduction Relationships in Comminution''', Transactions AIME, January 1957, Pages 80 - 88 [http://www.onemine.org/search/summary.cfm/EnergySize-Reduction-Relationships-In-Comminution?d=123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123436202&fullText=reduction%20relationships]
+# ''Charles, R.J.'', '''Energy-Size Reduction Relationships in Comminution''', Transactions AIME, January 1957, Pages 80 - 88 [http://www.onemine.org/document/abstract.cfm?docid=13062&title=Minerals-Beneficiation--EnergySize-Reduction-Relationships-in-Comminution OneMine link]
 # ''Taggart, A. F.'', '''Handbook of Mineral Dressing''', Wiley Engineering Handbook Series, original 1927, republished 1945, 1948, 1950, 1953
-# ''Lynch, A. J.'' and ''Rowland, C. A'', '''The History of Grinding''', [https://www.smenet.org/store/mining-books.cfm/History-of-Grinding/238-6 SME, 2005]
+# ''Lynch, A. J.'' and ''Rowland, C. A'', '''The History of Grinding''', [http://smemi.personifycloud.com/PersonifyEbusiness/Store/ProductDetails.aspx?productId=116847 SME, 2005]
 # ed. ''Kawatra, S. K.'', '''Advances in Comminution''', [https://www.smenet.org/store/mining-books.cfm/Advances-in-Comminution/246-7 SME, 2006]
 # ''Vanderbeek, J.'', '''Grinding circuit evolution at Chino Mines Company''', Proceedings of the SAG 1996 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 23 June 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Specific Energy Consumption is the most common way of describing how much energy is used by grinding, and is the basis of the throughput estimations in SAGMILLING.COM. It is usually expressed as kWh/t (kilowatt-hours per tonne).		Specific Energy Consumption is the most common way of describing how much energy is used by grinding, and is the basis of the throughput estimations in SAGMILLING.COM. It is usually expressed as kWh/t (kilowatt-hours per tonne).

−	Models of this type assume a [[standard particle size distribution]] and use a single position on that particle size distribution to characterize the entire curve. The most common way to express this is the 80% passing size, which can be expressed as ''F<sub>80</sub>'' (feed stream 80% passing size), ''P<sub>80</sub>'' (product stream 80% passing size), or ''K<sub>80</sub>'' (generic stream 80% passing size.	+	Models of this type assume a [[standard particle size distribution]] and use a single position on that particle size distribution to characterize the entire curve. The most common way to express this is the 80% passing size, which can be expressed as ''F<sub>80</sub>'' (feed stream 80% passing size), ''P<sub>80</sub>'' (product stream 80% passing size), or ''K<sub>80</sub>'' (generic stream 80% passing size).