<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.sagmilling.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Benchmarking%3A_Collahuasi_ball_mill_model</id>
	<title>Benchmarking: Collahuasi ball mill model - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.sagmilling.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Benchmarking%3A_Collahuasi_ball_mill_model"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sagmilling.com/index.php?title=Benchmarking:_Collahuasi_ball_mill_model&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-06T11:54:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.sagmilling.com/index.php?title=Benchmarking:_Collahuasi_ball_mill_model&amp;diff=689&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Alex Doll: Created page with &quot;==Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi== ''Villouta, R.M.'', '''Collahuasi: After years of operation''', Proceedings of the International Autogenous and Semiautogen...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sagmilling.com/index.php?title=Benchmarking:_Collahuasi_ball_mill_model&amp;diff=689&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-05-31T15:57:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;==Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi== &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Villouta, R.M.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Collahuasi: After years of operation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Proceedings of the International Autogenous and Semiautogen...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Benchmarking: Ball Mill Power Draw - Collahuasi==&lt;br /&gt;
''Villouta, R.M.'', '''Collahuasi: After years of operation''', Proceedings of the International Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding Technology conference (SAG 2001), Vancouver, Canada, Pages I-31 &amp;amp;ndash; I-42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ball mill dimensions 22 ft diameter by 36 ft (35.5 ft effective grinding length)&lt;br /&gt;
* shell-supported, flat ended mills&lt;br /&gt;
* twin-pinion drive&lt;br /&gt;
* Synchronous fixed speed motor size 4850 kW (with pinion)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mill speed originally 74% of critical, later changed to 78% of critical.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ball charge 35% v/v (retaining ring)&lt;br /&gt;
* DCS power draw originally 8900 kW, rose to 9200 kW&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
* ore density 2.6 t/m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* liner thickness 6 inches&lt;br /&gt;
* slurry 70% solids&lt;br /&gt;
* motor efficiency (efficiency to DCS value) 0.942 (author's notes from a site visit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &lt;br /&gt;
! DCS Power, kW&lt;br /&gt;
! Speed, % &lt;br /&gt;
of critical&lt;br /&gt;
! Mill filling&lt;br /&gt;
! Morrell Model, kW&lt;br /&gt;
! Nordberg model, kW&lt;br /&gt;
(no density correction)&lt;br /&gt;
! Nordberg model, kW&lt;br /&gt;
(density correction)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| original &lt;br /&gt;
| 8900&lt;br /&gt;
| 74% &lt;br /&gt;
| 35% v/v&lt;br /&gt;
| 9044 (+1.6%)&lt;br /&gt;
| [deduct 5%] 8183 (-8.8%)&lt;br /&gt;
| [deduct 5%] 8717 (-2.1%)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| later&lt;br /&gt;
| 9200&lt;br /&gt;
| 78%&lt;br /&gt;
| 35% v/v&lt;br /&gt;
| 9655 (+4.9%)&lt;br /&gt;
| [deduct 5%] 8890 (-3.5%)&lt;br /&gt;
| [deduct 5%] 9471 (+2.9%)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
All power values relative to DCS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discussion===&lt;br /&gt;
The Nordberg models aren't really set up for flat-ended mills; the empirical basis of Nordberg models are cone-ended mills.  Literature suggests a typical 5% factor be applied to convert a flat-ended mill (shell-supported) to a cone (trunnion-supported).  The values in the table deduct 5% from the raw values shown in the Nordberg model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As this is a somewhat atypical mill configuration, the '''Overflow ball mill using full Morrell C-model''' is recommended as the cone angle is a parameter of the equations.  It is possible to get the Nordberg model to mimic the 5% reduction shown above (by modifying the ''mechanical efficiency'' factor), but not recommended.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alex Doll</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>